Persimmon furious over Bellway's social housing plan

Discussion in 'Bellway Homes' started by Maple Lodge, Oct 16, 2009.

  1. Maple Lodge

    Maple Lodge New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    16 October 2009

    By Michael Willoughby

    Housebuilder of ‘aspirational’ Hartlepool development joins popular protest against partner of 12 years

    Persimmon Homes has joined the attack on Bellway Homes for building social housing on a site previously reserved for private homes.

    The news follows growing concern from private residents over homes on estates marketed as for private sale, but later converted to social housing when sales proved difficult. In March, Building revealed that residents on three Bellway sites were planning to sue the builder over the issue.

    Persimmon has joined nearly 100 residents on the Bishop Cuthbert estate in Middle Warren, Hartlepool, and lodged an objection to the plans on the council’s website. This is despite the fact that in 1997, the two formed a 12-year partnership to develop the estate.

    Peter Jordan, Persimmon’s regional projects director, said “all hell broke loose” when estate residents found out about plans to build 35 rent-to-buy and 15 social homes.

    The homes were included to attract funding from the government’s Kickstart initiative, which is intended to restart work on stalled housing sites. Earlier this month the government granted Bellway £1.9m to build 50 social homes on the “prestige” estate in County Durham.

    Persimmon is particularly annoyed because, it says, Bellway lodged the application for Kickstart funds without consulting it.

    Persimmon says it is objecting to the application because it thinks “regeneration” housing would be more suitable within Hartlepool, rather than the “aspirational” estate on its northern outskirts.

    Buyers say they exchanged contracts based on the old masterplan after the planning application for the social housing had been lodged. Persimmon claims that some buyers of homes built under the firm’s upmarket Charles Church brand have already walked away from the deals.

    In February this year, homeowners on The Chase “executive” development in Hampshire accused Bellway of turning it into a “glorified council estate” after it sold 30 units to a housing associations [sing or pl?].



    Read more: Persimmon furious over Bellway's social housing plan - Building
     
  2. dazzlerbing

    dazzlerbing New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    how strange that Persimmon should complain about Bellway doing this when Persimmon (east of Scotland) have just done exactly the same in Bathgate. I especially like the 'glorified council estate' part as this is what they have denied doing up here!!
     

Share This Page

Newbuild inspections image